Christine Berend and Think Finance
Christine Berend’s association with Think Finance, a now-defunct online lending company, is a complex and controversial subject. While she held prominent roles within the organization, including Chief Operating Officer and Chief Information Officer, the company’s eventual downfall amidst allegations of predatory lending and regulatory scrutiny casts a shadow on her tenure.
Think Finance operated a network of online lenders offering short-term, high-interest loans, often marketed as payday loans or installment loans. These products, while providing quick access to cash, were criticized for trapping borrowers in cycles of debt due to exorbitant interest rates and fees. The company faced lawsuits and investigations from various state and federal agencies, including the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB), alleging deceptive practices and violations of consumer protection laws.
Berend’s specific responsibilities within Think Finance encompassed overseeing various aspects of the company’s operations, including technology infrastructure, customer service, and compliance. As COO and CIO, she would have been involved in strategic decision-making and the implementation of company policies. While her exact role in shaping the company’s lending practices is debated, her leadership position undoubtedly placed her in a position of influence.
Following the regulatory crackdown and legal battles, Think Finance filed for bankruptcy in 2017. The bankruptcy proceedings revealed the extent of the company’s debt and the challenges it faced in defending itself against numerous lawsuits. The aftermath involved settlements with various states and the CFPB, resulting in significant financial penalties and restrictions on the company’s operations.
The legacy of Think Finance and the roles of its executives, including Christine Berend, remain controversial. Critics argue that they profited from exploiting vulnerable borrowers through predatory lending practices. Defenders might contend that the company provided a needed service to individuals with limited access to traditional credit, and that regulatory overreach contributed to its demise. However, the overwhelming narrative focuses on the detrimental impact of high-cost loans and the ethical considerations surrounding the online lending industry.
It’s important to consider the broader context of the online lending landscape during Berend’s time at Think Finance. The industry was rapidly evolving, with new technologies and business models emerging. Regulatory frameworks struggled to keep pace with these changes, creating opportunities for companies to operate in legally ambiguous areas. The debate surrounding Think Finance and its executives highlights the ongoing need for responsible lending practices and effective consumer protection measures in the digital age.