Judgment Finance: Funding Litigation’s Aftermath
Judgment finance, also known as post-settlement funding or legal funding, provides capital to plaintiffs and judgment creditors who have already won a legal judgment or settlement but are waiting to receive payment. This specialized form of finance offers immediate liquidity in exchange for a portion of the eventual payout. It’s essentially a loan secured by the judgment or settlement itself.
How it Works
The process typically involves a judgment creditor approaching a judgment finance company. The company evaluates the validity and collectability of the judgment, considering factors like the defendant’s ability to pay, the likelihood of appeals, and the legal complexities involved. If the judgment is deemed a worthy investment, the finance company offers a lump sum payment, usually a percentage of the total judgment value, to the creditor. In return, the creditor agrees to repay the financed amount plus a pre-determined fee or a percentage of the final recovery when the judgment is enforced.
The key aspect is that judgment finance is non-recourse. This means that if the judgment ultimately proves uncollectible, the plaintiff is not obligated to repay the funding company. The risk falls entirely on the financier. This feature makes it an attractive option for plaintiffs facing financial hardship while waiting for payment.
Benefits for Plaintiffs
Judgment finance offers several significant advantages to plaintiffs:
- Immediate Access to Funds: It provides immediate relief from financial pressures, allowing plaintiffs to pay bills, cover living expenses, or invest in other opportunities while awaiting judgment enforcement.
- Level Playing Field: It empowers plaintiffs to resist lowball settlement offers from defendants, particularly those attempting to delay payment or wear down the plaintiff through protracted legal battles.
- Risk Mitigation: The non-recourse nature protects plaintiffs from further financial losses if the judgment is ultimately uncollectible.
- Improved Negotiation Power: With funding in place, plaintiffs can afford to negotiate more strategically and pursue maximum compensation.
Considerations and Potential Downsides
While beneficial, judgment finance also involves considerations:
- Cost: The cost of judgment finance can be substantial, as the financing company bears the risk of non-recovery. Interest rates and fees can be significant, potentially reducing the overall recovery for the plaintiff.
- Due Diligence: Plaintiffs should carefully vet potential funders, comparing terms and ensuring transparency in the funding agreement.
- Impact on Attorneys: Attorneys need to be aware of the funding arrangement and its potential impact on their fee structure and ethical obligations.
Conclusion
Judgment finance provides a valuable tool for plaintiffs seeking immediate liquidity after securing a judgment or settlement. It can level the playing field and alleviate financial burdens. However, it’s crucial to understand the associated costs and risks thoroughly before entering into an agreement. When used strategically and with careful consideration, judgment finance can be a powerful resource for maximizing recovery and achieving financial stability.